Sunday 25 October 2020

Current Status of Systemic Drug Delivery Research: A Bibliometric Study

 Source: https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-54490-4_2

Current Status of Systemic Drug Delivery Research: A Bibliometric Study

  • Saba Ale Ebrahim
  • Maysam Zamani PedramEmail author
  • Nader Ale Ebrahim
  • Saba Ale Ebrahim
    • 1
    • 2
  • Maysam Zamani Pedram
    • 2
    • 3
    Email author
  • Nader Ale Ebrahim
    • 4
  1. 1.Faculty of Electrical EngineeringIran University of Science and TechnologyTehranIran
  2. 2.Faculty of Electrical EngineeringK.N. Toosi University of TechnologyTehranIran
  3. 3.Department of Mechanical and Manufacturing EngineeringUniversity of CalgaryCalgaryCanada
  4. 4.Research and Technology DepartmentAlzahra UniversityVanak, TehranIran
Chapter
First Online:
  • 4 Downloads
Part of the Healthy Ageing and Longevity book series (HAL, volume 13)

Abstract

The previous chapter has presented an overview of the roles and limitations of systemic delivery in anti-ageing medicine. This chapter will examine the publication trend of research in systemic drug delivery by using a bibliometric approach. The data will be collected from the Scopus database to study the research trend from 1974 to 2019, and will be analyzed using network analysis of research outputs. Journals that have published related articles will be analyzed based on a diverse range of factors (including document citations, countries, topics and keywords). According to the publication trend identified, research in systemic drug delivery is a hotspot. With the bibliometric study presented, this chapter will offer an overview of the current status and future directions of research in systemic drug delivery.

Keywords

Publication trend Bibliometrics Drug delivery Literature research Research direction 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

Glossary

Bibliometrics

Adiscipline in which the progress of a given discipline is studied, evaluated and monitored by applying mathematical and statistical methods to analyse publications.

Databases

Structured collections of data.

Dendrogram

A type of diagrams displaying the results of hierarchical clustering.

Hirsch index

Serves as an alternative to traditional journal impact factor metrics for the evaluation of the impact of the work done by a particular researcher.

PRISMA

A set of guidelines governing the items to be reported in systematic reviews and meta-analyses.

Pubmed

A database developed by the National Center for Biotechnology Information at the National Library of Medicine.

R tool

A software for statistical computing and graphic plotting.

Scientometrics

A discipline to quantitative study science, communication in science, and science policy.

Scopus

An indexing database held by Elsevier, containing abstracts and citations for journal articles, book chapters and conference papers.

Web of science

An indexing database within Web of Knowledge. It is held by Thomson Reuters.

References

  1. Aghaei Chadegani A, Salehi H, Yunus MM, Farhadi H, Fooladi M, Farhadi M et al (2013) A comparison between two main academic literature collections: web of science and scopus databases. Asian Soc Sci 9:18–26Google Scholar
  2. Ale Ebrahim S, Ashtari A, Pedram MZ, Ale EN (2019) Publication trends in drug delivery and magnetic nanoparticles. Nanoscale Res Lett 14:164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anselmo AC, Gokarn Y, Mitragotri S (2019) Non-invasive delivery strategies for biologics. Nat Rev Drug Discov 18:19–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Aria M, Cuccurullo C (2017) bibliometrix: an R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. J Informetrics 11:959–975CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bhagwat RR, Vaidhya IS (2013) Novel drug delivery systems: an overview. Int J Pharm Sci Res 4:970–982Google Scholar
  6. Das A-K (2015) Introduction to research evaluation metrics and related indicators. In: Sen BK, Mishra S (Eds) Research evaluation metrics. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, FranceGoogle Scholar
  7. Davidson PM, Newton PJ, Ferguson C, Daly J, Elliott D, Homer C et al (2014) Rating and ranking the role of bibliometrics and webometrics in nursing and midwifery. Sci World J.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/135812CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Eckman WW, Patlak CS, Fenstermacher JD (1974) A critical evaluation of the principles governing the advantages of intra-arterial infusions. J Pharmacokinet Biopharm 2:257–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Floriano JF, de Barros NR, Cinman JLF, da Silva RG, Loffredo AV, Borges FA et al (2017) Ketoprofen loaded in natural rubber latex transdermal patch for tendinitis treatment. J Polym Environ 26:2281–2289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gagliardi A, Paolino D, Iannone M, Palma E, Fresta M, Cosco D (2018) Sodium deoxycholate-decorated zein nanoparticles for a stable colloidal drug delivery system. Int J Nanomed 13:601–614CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ghanbari Baghestan A, Khaniki H, Kalantari A, Akhtari-Zavare M, Farahmand E, Tamam E et al (2019) A crisis in “open access”: should communication scholarly outputs take 77 years to become open access? SAGE Open 9:1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Harzing A-W (2019) Two new kids on the block: how do crossref and dimensions compare with Google Scholar, Microsoft Academic, Scopus and the Web of Science? Scientometrics 120:341–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Huang Y, Ma J, Porter AL, Kwon S, Zhu D (2015) Analyzing collaboration networks and developmental patterns of nano-enabled drug delivery (NEDD) for brain cancer. Beilstein J Nanotechnol 6:1666–1676CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hu D, Li T, Xu Z, Liu D, Yang M, Zhu L (2018) Self-stabilized silk sericin-based nanoparticles: In vivo biocompatibility and reduced doxorubicin-induced toxicity. Acta Biomater 74:385–396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jamali SM, Md Zain AN, Samsudin MA, Ale EN (2015) Publication trends in physics education: a bibliometric study. J Educ Res 35:19–36Google Scholar
  16. Jia H-R, Zhu Y-X, Xu K-F, Liu X, Wu F-G (2018) Plasma membrane-anchorable photosensitizing nanomicelles for lipid raft-responsive and light-controllable intracellular drug delivery. J Control Release 286:103–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Klemetsrud T, Kjøniksen A-L, Hiorth M, Jacobsen J, Smistad G (2018) Polymer coated liposomes for use in the oral cavity—a study of the in vitro toxicity, effect on cell permeability and interaction with mucin. J Liposome Res 28:62–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Liu J-M, Zhang D-D, Fang G-Z, Wang S (2018) Erythrocyte membrane bioinspired near-infrared persistent luminescence nanocarriers for in vivo long-circulating bioimaging and drug delivery. Biomaterials 165:39–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ma J, Porter AL, Aminabhavi TM, Zhu D (2015) Nano-enabled drug delivery systems for brain cancer and Alzheimer’s disease: research patterns and opportunities. Nanomedicine 11:1763–1771CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG (2009) Group atP. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Annal Intern Med 151:264–269Google Scholar
  21. Nag O, Naciri J, Erickson J, Oh E, Delehanty J (2018) Hybrid liquid crystal nanocarriers for enhanced zinc phthalocyanine-mediated photodynamic therapy. Bioconjug Chem 29Google Scholar
  22. Nordin N, Samsudin M-A, Abdul-Khalid S-N, Ale EN (2019) Firms’ sustainable practice research in developing countries: mapping the cited literature by Bibliometric analysis approach. Int J Sustain Strateg Manag 7:5–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Park K (2014) Controlled drug delivery systems: past forward and future back. J Control Release 190:3–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Pitchaimani A, Nguyen T, Aryal S (2018) Natural killer cell membrane infused biomimetic liposomes for targeted tumor therapy. Biomaterials 160:124–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Robert C, Wilson CS, Venuta A, Ferrari M, Arreto CD (2017) Evolution of the scientific literature on drug delivery: a 1974–2015 bibliometric study. J Control Release 260:226–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Shahrezaei M, Oryan A, Bastami F, Hosseinpour S, Shahrezaee M, Kamali A (2018) Comparative impact of systemic delivery of atorvastatin, simvastatin, and lovastatin on bone mineral density of the ovariectomized rats. Endocrine 60:138–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Sørli JB, Balogh Sivars K, Da Silva E, Hougaard KS, Koponen IK, Zuo YY et al (2018) Bile salt enhancers for inhalation: correlation between in vitro and in vivo lung effects. Int J Pharm 550:114–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Svenson S (2004) Carrier-based drug delivery. American Chemical Society, WashingtonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Wilson E, Luft J, DeSimone J (2018) Formulation of high-performance dry powder aerosols for pulmonary protein delivery. Pharm Res 35:195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Yoo Y, Yoon S-J, Kim S, Lee D-W, Um S, Hyun H et al (2018) A local drug delivery system based on visible light-cured glycol chitosan and doxorubicin⋅hydrochloride for thyroid cancer treatment in vitro and in vivo. Drug Deliv 25:1664–1671CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020
Posted by at
Labels: , , , ,

No comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)