All of the cases COPE has discussed since its inception in 1997
have been entered into a searchable database. This database now contains
over 500 cases together with the advice given by COPE. For more recent
cases, the database also includes follow-up information and about
outcome, and podcasts are available for most of the newer cases. We hope
this database will provide a valuable resource for editors and those
researching publication ethics.
You can search by classification or keyword using either the search
field (top left) or by filtering your inquiry using the years and
classifications/keywords listed below. A more detailed explanation of
the classifications and keywords can be found on the COPE Case Taxonomy page.
We encourage members to look at the database before submitting a case
to the Forum to see if similar cases have already been discussed and to
see the format used for presenting cases. However, please note that
advice from the COPE Forum meetings is specific to the particular case
under consideration and may not necessarily be applicable to similar
cases either past or future.
COPE accepts no liability for any loss or damage caused or occasioned
as a result of advice given by them or by any COPE member. Advice given
by COPE and its members is not given for the purposes of court
proceedings within any jurisdiction and may not be cited or relied upon
for this purpose.
have been entered into a searchable database. This database now contains
over 500 cases together with the advice given by COPE. For more recent
cases, the database also includes follow-up information and about
outcome, and podcasts are available for most of the newer cases. We hope
this database will provide a valuable resource for editors and those
researching publication ethics.
You can search by classification or keyword using either the search
field (top left) or by filtering your inquiry using the years and
classifications/keywords listed below. A more detailed explanation of
the classifications and keywords can be found on the COPE Case Taxonomy page.
We encourage members to look at the database before submitting a case
to the Forum to see if similar cases have already been discussed and to
see the format used for presenting cases. However, please note that
advice from the COPE Forum meetings is specific to the particular case
under consideration and may not necessarily be applicable to similar
cases either past or future.
COPE accepts no liability for any loss or damage caused or occasioned
as a result of advice given by them or by any COPE member. Advice given
by COPE and its members is not given for the purposes of court
proceedings within any jurisdiction and may not be cited or relied upon
for this purpose.
Satire in scholarly publishing
Case number:17-06Year:2017Resolution:On-going
Would the loss of a clinical licence in one country impact on the ability to do clinical work in another?
Case number:17-01Year:2017Resolution:On-going
Is it plagiarism to use text verbatim from a manuscript review?
Case number:17-05Year:2017Resolution:On-going
Data manipulation and institute’s internal review
When to conclude correspondence from reader about errors in a published article
Case number:17-03Year:2017Resolution:On-going
Authorship dispute regarding author order
Case number:17-04Year:2017Resolution:On-going
Submission of an already published case report
Case number:17-07Year:2017Resolution:On-going
Suspected unattributed text in a published article
Case histories and post publication debate
Case number:16-19Year:2016Resolution:Case Closed
Publication of post-doctoral work
Case number:16-18Year:2016Resolution:On-going
Withdrawal of accepted manuscript from predatory journal
Case number:16-22Year:2016Resolution:Case Closed
Institutional investigation of authorship dispute
Case number:16-15Year:2016Resolution:Case Closed
Author accused of stealing research and publishing under their name
Case number:16-17Year:2016Resolution:Case Closed
Request by organisation to retract article and publish expression of concern
Case number:16-16Year:2016Resolution:Case Closed
Authorship dispute and possible unreported protocol amendment
Case number:16-14Year:2016Resolution:On-going
Author requests permission to publish review comments
Case number:16-13Year:2016Resolution:Case Closed
Author of rejected paper publicly names and criticises peer reviewer
Case number:16-12Year:2016Resolution:Case Closed
What extent of plagiarism demands a retraction vs correction?
Case number:16-11Year:2016Resolution:Case Closed
The role of the lead author
Case number:16-20Year:2016Resolution:Case Closed
Parental consent for participants
Case number:16-07Year:2016Resolution:Case Closed
Paper B plagiarised paper A: what to do if a journal does not respond?
Case number:16-10Year:2016Resolution:On-going
Low risk study with no ethics committee approval
Case number:16-06Year:2016Resolution:Case Closed
Author requests for certain experts not to be included in the editorial process
Case number:16-08Year:2016Resolution:Case Closed
Publication of expression of concern
Case number:16-09Year:2016Resolution:On-going
Data anonymity
Case number:16-05Year:2016Resolution:Case Closed
Cases | Committee on Publication Ethics: COPE
No comments:
Post a Comment