Source: https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.23753898.v1
📚📝 Excited to share my latest presentation on "Research Tools for Literature Search, Paper Writing, Journal Selection, and Disseminating Your Research"! 🚀
Source: https://medium.com/@aitips/best-34-ai-tools-you-need-to-check-out-right-now-cef173aaa915
Artificial Intelligence (AI) has come a long way, and today, it has become an indispensable tool for businesses looking to increase their efficiency and productivity.
AI tools are not just limited to large corporations anymore, and small businesses and individuals can also leverage them to gain a competitive edge.
In this article, we will discuss the best 30 AI tools that you need to check out now and hopefully find something useful that can help you in your everyday life and just maybe change your life forever. Lets check them out
CopyAI — CopyAI is an AI-powered writing assistant that can help with content creation. It uses natural language processing and machine learning to suggest ideas, write articles, and provide feedback on existing content.
Writesonic is an AI writing tool that can help with copywriting and content creation. It uses machine learning algorithms to generate high-quality content based on your input.
People can generate content for a variety of purposes, such as blog posts, product descriptions, and social media posts. Super convinient!!
Shineranker is an SEO tool that can help optimize website rankings. It provides a range of features, including keyword research, link analysis, and competitor analysis.
With this tool, users can identify areas for improvement and optimize their website accordingly.
JasperAI — JasperAI is an AI-powered copywriting tool that can generate high-quality content. It uses natural language processing and machine learning to analyze text and generate output that is consistent with the user’s style and tone.
You can generate content for a variety of purposes, such as blog posts, social media posts, and product descriptions.
CopysmithAI is an AI writing tool that can help with creating high-converting copy. It uses machine learning to generate product descriptions, social media posts, and ad copy that is tailored to the user’s needs.
Creators can provide input and receive output that is optimized for their target audience.
A tool that can help you write articles and stories by giving you ideas and writing words for you.
A tool that helps people who make videos for YouTube to get more views and subscribers. Has recently added a AI feature that is very useful for your creative process!!
A tool that can help you make videos for social media by giving you ideas and making the video for you.
Helps you make videos by providing templates and tools to add text and animations. This tool is really really handy!!
AI tool for creating engaging visual content Pictory is an AI tool that helps create visually engaging content, making it easier for users to produce high-quality graphics, images, and videos. This tool is good for video editors specifically but works for anyone really!!
Predis is a tool that can help you make your website better by giving you simple and complex ideas on how to make it easier for people to use.
Piggy To is a tool that helps you shorten long URLs, making them easier to share with others. It’s like using a pair of scissors to cut a piece of paper to make it the right size.
Profile Picture AI is a tool that helps you create a unique profile picture for your online accounts. You can choose from a variety of designs and colors to make it look just the way you want it to.
This tool iffusion is a tool that helps you manage your social media accounts by scheduling posts in advance. It’s like having a robot assistant that helps you keep your social media presence up-to-date.
MubertAI is a tool that helps you create music for your projects. It uses artificial intelligence to generate music based on your needs and preferences. This one is a must!!
LongShotAI is a tool that helps you generate product descriptions and other marketing copy. It uses artificial intelligence to understand your needs and create high-quality text that fits your requirements.
Wolfram Alpha is a tool that helps you solve complex problems and answer questions. It’s like a search engine for knowledge!
ChatGPT is a tool that can answer your questions and provide information on a variety of topics. It uses artificial intelligence to understand your needs and provide relevant answers. Everyone has heard of it, just had to get it in here!
Hoppy Copy is a tool that helps you write stuff like website pages and ads. It uses a smart computer brain to give you ideas and make your writing better and faster. Hoppy Copy can save you time and help you create better words for your business.
Moonbeam is a tool that helps you create beautiful, professional-looking graphics for your social media posts, presentations, and other projects. It’s like having a magic wand that can turn your ideas into stunning visuals.
YoodliAI is a tool that helps you generate unique ideas for your writing projects. It’s like having a brainstorming partner who can help you come up with new and exciting ideas.
Cleanup Pictures is a tool that helps you enhance your photos by removing unwanted elements and adjusting colors and brightness. It’s like having a magic eraser that can make your photos look their best.
Link Here: Cleanup.pictures
YaaraAI is an AI-powered tool that can help you with your social media marketing. It can generate posts, captions, and hashtags that are tailored to your brand and target audience. With YaaraAI, you can save time and improve your social media engagement.
MagicTypeAI is a writing tool that helps you write better and faster by predicting what you want to say next. It uses artificial intelligence to suggest words and phrases as you type, making it easier to express your thoughts and ideas.
WatchNowAI is a video creation tool that can help you create engaging videos for your business. It uses artificial intelligence to analyze your video footage and generate engaging clips that you can use to create professional-looking videos.
DraykIT is an all-in-one marketing platform that can help you with your email marketing, social media marketing, and search engine optimization (SEO) efforts. With DraykIT, you can create and send emails, schedule social media posts, and optimize your website for search engines.
Just kidding, it is basically everything you could’ve asked for in a AI, too much to explain in this article 😅😂
Speechelo is a text-to-speech tool that can help you create high-quality voiceovers for your videos. It uses artificial intelligence to generate natural-sounding voices in over 20 languages.
Vidiq is a YouTube optimization tool that can help you grow your channel and increase your views and subscribers. With Vidiq, you can analyze your channel’s performance, optimize your video metadata, and get ideas for new content.
Inflact is a social media management tool that can help you automate your Instagram marketing. With Inflact, you can schedule posts, automate your engagement, and analyze your performance.
Kafkai is a content generation tool that uses artificial intelligence to create high-quality articles for your website or blog. With Kafkai, you can save time and effort by generating unique and engaging content in just a few clicks.
PhotoAI is an image editing tool that uses artificial intelligence to enhance your photos. With PhotoAI, you can improve the lighting, colors, and overall quality of your photos in just a few clicks.
Link Here: Photoai.com
HeadshotPro is a tool that can help you create professional-looking headshots for your business. With HeadshotPro, you can edit your photos, add backgrounds, and adjust your lighting to create the perfect headshot.
Linkwhisper is a WordPress plugin that can help you with your internal linking strategy. With Linkwhisper, you can automate the process of adding internal links to your content, making it easier to improve your website’s SEO.
GetGenie is a virtual assistant that can help you with your business tasks. With GetGenie, you can schedule appointments, make phone calls, and manage your to-do list, all with the help of an AI-powered assistant.
Stanford President Marc Tessier-Lavigne will resign effective Aug. 31, according to communications released by the University Wednesday morning. He will also retract or issue lengthy corrections to five widely cited papers for which he was principal author after a Stanford-sponsored investigation found “manipulation of research data.”
According to Jerry Yang, chair of the Stanford Board of Trustees, Tessier-Lavigne will step down “in light of the report and its impact on his ability to lead Stanford.” Former Dean of Humanities Richard Saller will serve as interim president. In a separate statement, Tessier-Lavigne defended his reputation but acknowledged that issues with his research, first raised in a Daily investigation last autumn, meant that Stanford requires a president “whose leadership is not hampered by such discussions.”
“At various times when concerns with Dr. Tessier-Lavigne’s papers emerged—in 2001, the early 2010s, 2015-2016, and March 2021—Dr. Tessier-Lavigne failed to decisively and forthrightly correct mistakes in the scientific record,” Stanford’s report said, identifying a number of apparent manipulations in Tessier-Lavigne’s neuroscientific research.
The report concluded that the fudging of results under Tessier-Lavigne’s purview “spanned labs at three separate institutions.” It identified a culture where Tessier-Lavigne “tended to reward the ‘winners’ (that is, postdocs who could generate favorable results) and marginalize or diminish the ‘losers’ (that is, postdocs who were unable or struggled to generate such data).”
The report concluded there was no evidence that Tessier-Lavigne himself manipulated data in the papers reviewed, nor that he knew about manipulation at the time. But the report noted Tessier-Lavigne “has not been able to provide an adequate explanation” for why he did not correct the scientific record when presented the opportunity on multiple occasions.
“I am gratified that the Panel concluded I did not engage in any fraud or falsification of scientific data,” Tessier-Lavigne said in a written statement. He acknowledged that “the report identified some areas where I should have done better, and I accept the report’s conclusions.”
The report identified “repeated instances of manipulation of research data and/or subpar scientific practices from different people and in labs run by Dr. Tessier-Lavigne at different institutions.”
Retracting a paper is a rare act, especially for a scientist of Tessier-Lavigne’s stature. A database of retractions shows that only four in every 10,000 papers are retracted. The move is saved for when there is “clear evidence that the findings are unreliable,” according to guidelines from the nonprofit Committee on Publication Ethics. Tessier-Lavigne had claimed repeatedly last autumn that the issues in his studies “do not affect the data, results or interpretation of the papers.”
For several papers worthy of retraction to have been principally authored by the same scientist represents “unusual frequency of manipulation of research data and/or substandard scientific practices,” the investigation concluded. Tessier-Lavigne is expected to retract or issue robust corrections to at least five papers in response to concerns he had not addressed for years, including a widely publicized study that he once claimed “turn[s] our current understanding of Alzheimer’s on its head.”
Stanford’s report, released in a 95-page document Wednesday morning, is the work of Mark Filip, a former deputy attorney general contracted by a special committee of the Stanford Board of Trustees to review allegations first identified in Daily reporting last November. Filip drafted several high-profile scientists, including Nobel laureate Randy Schekman, former Princeton president Shirley Tilghman, former Harvard provost Steve Hyman and two other members of the National Academies.
The investigation took eight months, with one member stepping off after The Daily revealed that he maintained an $18 million investment in a biotech company Tessier-Lavigne cofounded. Reporting by The Daily this week shows that some witnesses to an alleged incident of fraud during Tessier-Lavigne’s time at the biotechnology company Genentech refused to cooperate because investigators would not guarantee them anonymity, even though they were bound by nondisclosure agreements.
Not guaranteeing anonymity in an investigation of this importance is an “extremely unusual move” that could hamper access to key witnesses, said Jeffrey Flier, who ran a number of research misconduct inquiries in his time as Dean of Harvard Medical School.
In the report, the scientific panel raised questions about allegations of fraud in a major 2009 Alzheimer’s study that claimed to have found the cause of neurodegeneration in Alzheimer’s patients and was publicly called “the most important discovery in Alzheimer’s in the last 20 years, maybe ever” by former Genentech executive Richard Scheller.
While the report found the central conclusions of the paper to be incorrect and said the quality of the research in Tessier-Lavigne’s lab “fell below accepted scientific practices,” the panel also said it “believes that the mistaken narrative of fraud in certain reporting may stem from a conflation of various events.” The report raised the possibility that allegations were confused with a separate 2010 incident of fraud in Tessier-Lavigne’s lab.
The 2010 incident involved a group of lab members reporting their suspicions about a coworker in Tessier-Lavigne’s lab, leading to the termination of a postdoc and the withdrawal of an already-submitted manuscript with Tessier-Lavigne listed as principal author, according to the report.
However, potential witnesses — who include five high-level executives and scientists at Genentech — have alleged in previous reporting by The Daily that there was indeed fraud in the 2009 paper and that Tessier-Lavigne was made aware in 2011 that scientists within Genentech had attempted to reproduce the findings and concluded its findings to be invalid. Tessier-Lavigne has denied this characterization and Genentech has contested the executives’ and scientists’ version of events. Each executive and scientist had spoken with The Daily about two separate instances in Tessier-Lavigne’s lab — the two the report suggested had been confused. Four of those people also spoke about a third instance of alleged fraud that they said resulted in another scientist under Tessier-Lavigne’s lab leaving the company.
The Stanford investigators were informed of this third alleged incident in a February email obtained by The Daily. The third allegation does not appear in the report, and witnesses with relevant knowledge about what happened say they were not asked about it during interviews.
Instead, the investigation concluded that the allegations of fabrication of data in the 2009 paper “are not accurate.” Tessier-Lavigne said “the report clearly refutes the allegations of fraud and misconduct that were made against me.”
One person with direct knowledge of the incidents at Genentech told The Daily Wednesday, “I did not confuse these two incidents.” The person said they told the Stanford committee about both. They told The Daily they were glad more details about Tessier-Lavigne’s lab continued to emerge.
None of the high-profile scientists on the committee would answer questions about their work or the decision not to guarantee anonymity. Filip and Aidan Ryan, an Edelman senior vice president for crisis communications serving as the spokesperson for the investigation, answered questions on background.
While the report said it had not found evidence of fraud in the 2009 paper, the panel concluded that the research that went into it “fell below accepted scientific practices, let alone Dr. Tessier-Lavigne’s self-described standard of scientific excellence” and that the paper ought to be retracted or face “a comprehensive and robust set of corrections.”
The report’s finding was a rebuke of Tessier-Lavigne’s public defense. His lawyer Stephen Neal, chair emeritus of Cooley, had written on Tessier-Lavigne’s behalf in a letter to The Daily last February that “a correction or retraction of those findings would have been unwarranted and inappropriate.”
The report confirmed many details previously reported by The Daily and broke new ground in other areas.
“Within weeks after the publication of” a 2001 article in the journal Science now thought to contain doctored imagery, the report said, a colleague in the field identified an error. “Dr. Tessier-Lavigne stated to the colleague in writing that he would take corrective action, including both contacting the journal and attempting to issue a correction…. He did not contact the journal and he did not attempt to issue an erratum, which is inadequate.”
The report noted that Tessier-Lavigne had not followed up for seven years on unpublished corrections to two of his papers in Science, concluding that “Dr. Tessier-Lavigne did not have an explanation for deciding to not follow up on the corrections beyond that he has a practice of drafting many emails to see how they read but only sends a portion of them and that he concluded the communication was unnecessary,” the report said. “To date, the scientific record remains uncorrected.”
The report noted that explanations made by Tessier-Lavigne in correspondence with editors at the journal Nature over manipulated research data in a 2004 paper were “not fully responsive to the range of publicly expressed concerns given the available forensic evidence.” Since then, Tessier-Lavigne “has acknowledged the presence of manipulation of research data,” and assented to a correction after the panel concluded it was “required and appropriate for the paper.”
Filip, who led the review, said in an interview that more investigations could come out of the board’s report.
Theo Baker is the Vol. 263 Spotlight Investigations Editor. A freshman from Washington, D.C., he is the youngest ever recipient of a George Polk Award. Contact tbaker 'at' stanforddaily.com. Find him on Twitter @tab_delete.
Source: https://www.lboro.ac.uk/research/support/publishing/measuring-research-visibility/
There are a wide range of ways you can improve the visibility and therefore the citedness of your research. A journal paper by Ebrahim et al (2013) identifies 33 ways to improve your citation frequency.
Some top tips include:
Research visibility is a critical aspect of the contemporary academic landscape, wherein the dissemination and recognition of scholarly work play an important role. It refers to the extent to which research findings are accessible, discoverable, and acknowledged by relevant audiences, including fellow researchers, industry professionals, policymakers, students, and the general public.
The enhancement of research visibility may foster broader engagement and collaboration within the scientific community. At the same time, researchers can connect with like-minded peers, facilitate the exchange of knowledge, and stimulate the development of new ideas and innovations. Additionally, enhanced research visibility leads to increased citations, which contribute to the academic impact and reputation of researchers and their affiliated institutions.
To enhance research visibility, researchers must proactively develop comprehensive strategies. This may involve social media to engage with audiences, participating in academic conferences, collaborating with the media to promote research findings, or adopting open access publishing practices. The following are some of the strategies you can take to enhance the visibility of your research.
To make your research open access, which means freely accessible to anyone without paywalls or subscription barriers, you can follow these simple steps:
Choose an open access journal. Look for reputable open access journals in your field. These journals publish articles that are immediately available to readers without any access restrictions. You can search for open access journals using directories like the Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ) or consult your colleagues and mentors for recommendations.
Use preprint servers. Consider posting your research findings on preprint servers such as arXiv, bioRxiv, or SSRN that allow researchers to share their work openly and receive feedback from the scientific community before final publication.
Consider self-archiving in institutional repositories. Check if your institution has a repository and familiarize yourself with their policies and guidelines regarding open access. Self-archiving allows you to make your research accessible while still publishing in traditional journals.
Sign author’s agreement and copyright. When submitting your paper to a journal, carefully review the author’s agreement or copyright transfer agreement. Ensure that you retain the right to self-archive your work in institutional repositories or on preprint servers. Negotiate with the journal if necessary to retain your rights to make your research openly accessible.
Consider using Creative Commons (CC) licenses. CC licenses allow you to specify the permissions and restrictions on how others can use, share, and build upon your work. These licenses make it clear that your research is openly available while still protecting your intellectual property rights.
Setting up and maintaining researcher profiles can greatly enhance your visibility and help you present your research. To creating and maintain effective researcher profiles you must think of the following:
Choose relevant platforms. Identify the platforms that are widely used in your field for researcher profiling, such as Google Scholar, ResearchGate, ORCID, LinkedIn, or institutional repositories. Each platform has its own features and audience, so select those that align with your goals and target audience
Create an ORCID Identifier. ORCID (Open Researcher and Contributor ID) is a unique identifier that distinguishes you from other researchers and helps connect your research outputs. Register for an ORCID ID, which you can use across multiple platforms to link your research and ensure accurate attribution
Set up profiles on selected platforms. Create accounts on the selected platforms and follow their guidelines for profile creation. Pay attention to profile fields and formatting options, and ensure consistency across platforms. Add your personal information, academic history, research interests, and affiliations
Upload publications. Add your publications to your profiles. For some platforms, you may need to manually enter the details, while others can automatically fetch your publications from databases like PubMed or Scopus. Include preprints, conference papers, book chapters, and any other relevant research outputs. Upload full-text documents or provide links to the published versions.
Keep profiles up to date. Regularly update your profiles to reflect your latest achievements and publications. Update your contact information, affiliations, publications, and research projects.
Monitor metrics and impact. Track the metrics associated with your profiles, such as citation counts, views, and downloads of your publications. This data can provide insights into the impact of your research and help you understand your audience. Some platforms offer analytics tools or integrate with external tools like Altmetric or PlumX for comprehensive impact tracking.
Promote and share your profiles. Promote your researcher profiles through various channels, including your personal website, social media, email signature, and professional networking events. Include links to your profiles in your publications and presentations. Actively sharing your profiles helps increase your visibility and encourages others to connect with and cite your work.
Creating a blog as a researcher can be an effective way to share your research and experiences with a broader audience. It concerns the following:
Define your blog’s purpose. Clarify the purpose of your blog. Identifying your target audience will help shape your content and communication style.
Choose a blogging platform. Select a user-friendly blogging platform that suits your needs. Popular options include WordPress, Blogger, Medium, or Ghost. Consider factors like customization options, ease of use, community engagement features, and the ability to integrate multimedia content.
Plan your content. Develop a content plan to ensure consistency and coherence in your blog posts. Outline potential topics, consider the frequency of your posts, and create a content calendar to maintain a regular publishing schedule.
Create engaging content. Start writing and publishing blog posts. Ensure your content is well-researched, informative, and accessible to a diverse audience. Incorporate engaging visuals, such as images, graphs, or infographics, to enhance the readability of your posts.
Encourage interaction and feedback. Enable comments on your blog posts to encourage reader engagement and feedback. Respond to comments promptly and engage in discussions to foster a sense of community.
Promote your blog. Actively promote your blog to expand your readership. Share your blog posts on social media channels, academic forums, and relevant professional networks. Consider guest posting on other blogs or collaborating with fellow researchers to increase exposure. Engage with the research community by commenting on and sharing other researchers' blogs.
Monitor analytics. Utilize analytics tools provided by your blogging platform to track key metrics such as page views, engagement rates, and popular content. Analyzing these metrics will help you understand your audience’s preferences and adjust your content strategy accordingly.
To make your publications easier to find and increase their discoverability, you can follow these strategies:
Optimize titles and abstracts. Craft clear, descriptive, and informative titles for your publications. Use keywords that accurately represent the content and relevance of your research. Similarly, write comprehensive and concise abstracts that summarize the key findings and contributions of your work. Including relevant keywords in the abstract can improve search engine indexing and retrieval.
Use standardized metadata. Ensure that your publications have standardized and consistent metadata. This includes information such as author names, affiliations, publication date, keywords, and subject classifications. Consistency in metadata helps search engines, indexing databases, and academic platforms to accurately index and categorize your publications.
Utilize relevant keywords. Identify and incorporate relevant keywords throughout your publication. Consider the specific terminology, concepts, and phrases that researchers in your field are likely to use when searching for related work.
Choose appropriate journals and databases. Publish your work in reputable journals and databases that are widely used and recognized in your field. High-impact factor journals and indexing databases can increase the visibility and accessibility of your research to a larger audience. Be mindful of selecting journals that align with the scope and focus of your research.
Utilize social media and academic networks. Leverage social media platforms and academic networking sites like ResearchGate, Academia.edu, or LinkedIn to promote and share your publications. Regularly post about your work, highlight key findings, and engage with discussions related to your research field. Engaging with colleagues and followers can help increase the visibility of your publications.
Engage with the media. Communicate your research findings to the broader public by engaging with the media. Write press releases or summaries of your work in accessible language and share them with journalists or science communication platforms. Increased media coverage can lead to wider dissemination of your research and enhance its visibility.
Monitor citations and metrics. Keep track of citations and other metrics related to your publications using tools like Google Scholar, Scopus, or Web of Science. Monitoring citations can provide insights into the impact and reach of your research. Analyzing these metrics helps you understand which publications are gaining traction and informs future research strategies.
Engaging in research networking communities is crucial for building connections, sharing knowledge, and fostering collaborations with fellow researchers. Study the following effective strategies to engage in research networking communities:
Join online platforms. Register and create profiles on online platforms specifically designed for research networking, such as ResearchGate, Academia.edu, LinkedIn, or Mendeley. These platforms allow you to connect with researchers in your field, share your work, and participate in discussions.
Participate in forums and discussion groups. Seek out forums and discussion groups relevant to your research area. Engage in discussions, ask questions, and contribute your expertise to build relationships with other researchers.
Attend conferences and workshops. Actively participate in conferences and workshops related to your research field. Attend sessions, present your work, and engage in discussions during networking breaks. Exchange contact information and follow up with researchers who share similar interests.
Collaborate on research projects. Seek opportunities for collaboration by reaching out to researchers who are conducting complementary or related research. Collaborative projects not only contribute to your research portfolio but also facilitate knowledge exchange and enhance your professional network.
Join professional associations. Become a member of professional associations related to your research field. Attend their events, participate in their activities, and take advantage of networking opportunities.
Attend research seminars and webinars. Regularly attend research seminars and webinars hosted by academic institutions, research centers, or professional associations. These events provide a platform to learn about cutting-edge research, interact with researchers, and establish new connections.
Offer to review papers. Volunteer as a peer reviewer for journals or conferences in your field. Participating in the peer review process not only strengthens your knowledge and expertise but also allows you to establish connections with fellow researchers and editors.
In conclusion, research visibility plays a crucial role in the success of researchers and the advancement of knowledge. By increasing the visibility of our research, we can foster collaboration, facilitate knowledge exchange, and make meaningful contributions to society. Following the strategies we described, we can amplify the impact of our research and contribute to a more interconnected scientific community.
Source: Ale Ebrahim, Nader (2023). Unveiling the Secrets of Nader's 'Research Tools' Mind Map: Fixing the Viewing Issue. figshare. Presentation. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.23617299.v1
