Sunday, 28 December 2014

Impact of Social Sciences – Shorter, better, faster, free: Blogging changes the nature of academic research, not just how it is communicated

 Source: http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2014/12/28/shorter-better-faster-free/



FacebookBufferPocketShare

Patrick-Dunleavy-thumb1Academic
blogging gets your work and research out to a potentially massive
audience at very, very low cost and relative amount of effort.
Patrick Dunleavy
argues blogging and tweeting from multi-author blogs especially is a
great way to build knowledge of your work, to grow readership of useful
articles and research reports, to build up citations, and to foster
debate across academia, government, civil society and the public in
genera
l.


One of the recurring themes (from many different contributors) on the
LSE Impact of Social Science blog is that a new paradigm of research
communications has grown up — one that de-emphasizes the traditional
journals route, and re-prioritizes faster, real-time academic
communication. Blogs play a critical intermediate role. They link to
research reports and articles on the one hand, and they are linked to
from Twitter, Facebook, Pinterest, Tumblr and Google+ news-streams and
communities. So in research terms blogging is quite simply, one of the
most important things that an academic should be doing right now.


But in addition, STEM scientists, social scientists and humanities
scholars all have an obligation to society to contribute their
observations to the wider world. At the moment that’s often being done


  • in ramshackle and impoverished ways
  • in pointlessly obscure or charged-for forums
  • in difficult language where you need to look up every second word in
    Wikipedia. Some of this is necessary for condensed specialist
    communication. But much of it is just unneeded jargon and poor writing
    dressed up as necessary vocabulary
  • with acres of ‘dead-on-arrival’ data (that will never be used by anyone else in the world), often presented in unreadable tables
  • and all delivered over bizarrely long-winded timescales. From
    submission to publication in some top economics journals now takes 3.5
    years. At the end of such a process any published paper is no more than a
    tombstone marking where happening debate and knowledge used to be, four
    or five years earlier.
So the public pay for all or much of our research (especially in
Europe and Australasia). And then we shunt back to them a few press
releases and a lot of out-of-date, arcanely phrased academic junk.


Types of blogs


A lot of people think that all blogs are solo blogs, but this is a
completely out of date view. A ‘blog’ is defined by Wikipedia as:


‘a truncation of the expression web log… [It] is a
discussion or informational site published on the World Wide Web and
consisting of discrete entries (“posts”) typically displayed in reverse
chronological order (the most recent post appears first). Until 2009
blogs were usually the work of a single individual, occasionally of a
small group, and often covered a single subject. More recently
“multi-author blogs” (MABs) have developed, with posts written by large
numbers of authors and professionally edited. MABs from newspapers,
other media outlets, universities, think tanks, advocacy groups and
similar institutions account for an increasing quantity of blog traffic.
The rise of Twitter and other “microblogging” systems helps integrate
MABs and single-author blogs into societal newstreams’. [Accessed 29
August 2014]. (Let me pause here to reassure some academic readers who
may be bristling at being asked to read Wikipedia text – I know this
passage is sound since I co-wrote much of it).
Actually the evolution of academic blogs specifically has now
progressed even further, so that we can distinguish group or
collaborative blogs as an important intermediate type between solo blogs
and multi-author blogs. The two tables below summarize how these three
types of blogs now work, drawing attention to their very different
advantages and disadvantages.














Why blogging works in academia




Blogging (supported by academic tweeting)
helps academics break free from all the legacy practices I covered at
the beginning of this post, although to differing extents, because:


  • It’s quick to do in real time. It taps academic expertise when it’s
    relevant, and so lets academics look forward and speculate in
    evidence-based yet timely ways. Esoteric knowledge and accumulated
    wisdom that might previously have been shared with four or five people
    over lunch in the Senior Common Room, or the PhD hangout, now gets out
    into the public domain, and can be read, tracked, emulated or contested.
  • It communicates bottom-line results and ‘take aways’ in clear
    language, yet with due regard to methods issues and quality of evidence.
    Twitter is a huge supplementary help, in forcing academics to
    communicate key messages in 140 characters!
  • Multi-author blogs especially help create multi-disciplinary
    understanding and the joining-up of previously siloed knowledge. They
    hugely reduce the barriers involved in keeping abreast of a wide range
    of knowledge, or in finding out for the first time about a subject or
    debate or field of work that is new to you. All the LSE family of blogs,
    for instance, cover 40+ different social sciences (and some related)
    areas like architecture, city planning and technology. Our EUROPP blog
    pools within this large discipline group for 50 countries in Europe, and
    our USAPP blog has the same focus for the United States, Canada and
    Mexico. The LSE Review of Books and the LSE Impacts blog both range even
    more widely, incorporating history, philosophy, media and cultural
    analyses that span across the social sciences and the humanities, and
    some fringe aspects of the huge STEM disciplines group. An enlarged
    disciplinary range that was once just the province of a few exceptional
    publications and magazines (like Scientific American or the Economist)
    becomes a lot more accessible to a much wider audience. Group blogs have
    lesser cross-disciplinary effects, because they are rarely widely
    visible — usually only insiders find them. But they contribute greatly
    to better communication within disciplines, and so they can help reduce
    barriers to learning by being passed on to well-informed or persistent
    outsiders to the discipline.
  • Blogging thus creates a vastly enlarged foundation for the
    development of ‘bridging’ academics, with real inter-disciplinary
    competences, honed by lots of interactions with people in other academic
    silos. By the 1980s the siloing of science and scholarship in
    reductionist mode meant that there was a sharply diminished potential
    for inter-disciplinary understanding. At that low point the bridging
    role was exploited only by a few ‘public intellectuals’ (on whom
    excessive attention is still focused). But now this key ‘bridging’ role
    is once again beginning to become a far wider-scale competency.
  • Blogging can also support in a novel and stimulating way the
    traditional role of a university as an agent of ‘local integration’
    across multiple disciplines. This capability is especially important now
    at the many interfaces between the social sciences and the STEM
    (science, technology, engineering and mathematics) disciplines, where
    co-operation across silos and growing genuinely trans-disciplinary
    research are increasingly salient for societal progress.
Academic blogging gets your work and research out to a potentially
massive audience at very, very low cost and relative amount of effort.
With platforms like WordPress, you can set up a very simple solo blog
and have your first article online in no more than 30 minutes. With
Medium (which of course I’m using here) the threshold is even lower ,
maybe 10 minutes. As soon as you register in Medium you get a blank
screen bearing the heartening message ‘Bang out some text!’ That’s what I
did in January this year, and since then many tens of thousand people
have downloaded these posts (e.g over 21,000 in just the last month).
The key difference between the two is that Medium is just for
communicating text — it has a very simplified editing function, and you
can’t easily control how your texts are listed. It’s best for people who
either have no Web competencies or don’t want to devote any time to
refining the ‘look and feel’ of their work online (I plead ‘guilty’ on
both counts). If that’s not you, then a WordPress solo blog is surely
the route for you to follow.


Recent research from the World Bank has
shown that blogging about an academic article can lead to hundreds of
new readers when before there were only a handful. Blogging and tweeting
from multi-author blogs especially is a great way to build knowledge of
your work, to grow readership of useful articles and research reports,
to build up citations, and to foster debate across academia, government,
civil society and the public in general.


Six tips for academic blog editors


I’m not an expert here, although I have helped design the format of
LSE’s top blogs, along with a great team of folk — whose wisdom and
expertise I’ve tried to briefly summarize here:


  • Make sure your titles tell a story, and that the findings of each
    post are communicated early on. Academics normally like to build up
    their arguments slowly, and then only tell you their findings with a
    final flourish at the end. And they often show great dedication in
    choosing obscure titles for their work. Don’t do this ‘Dance of the
    Seven Veils’ in which layers of irrelevance are progressively stripped
    aside for the final kernel of value-added knowledge to be revealed.
    Instead, make sure that all the information readers need to understand
    what you’re saying is up front — you’ll make a much stronger impression
    that way. In a group or multi-author blog content will often be eclectic
    and needs to be signposted to readers in really effective ways. So here
    the editors should always write the titles for posts (clearing them
    with the authors if you must). In all the big LSE blogs the editors also
    write an initial summary paragraph for readers, which is not cleared
    with authors because it is our understanding of what their key messages
    or findings are, and is clearly signposted as such. In a solo blog you
    are your own editor, always a problem. My advice would be to ask your
    partner or a friend for advice on the titles of important posts. Also
    see how people retweet you — their re-phrasings and summaries can often
    show you a better way of capturing what your post says.
  • Readers should never be in any doubt about who has written a blog.
    In multi-author blogs and group blogs, always give a decent short Bio of
    the authors, ideally including a photograph. It is important to tell
    readers clearly who the author(s) are, where they come from, how to
    contact them and to give URL links to their other recent books or work.
    In solo blogs make sure that you provide a clear explanation of who you
    are (again including a photograph), what the blog aims to do and how to
    contact you via email and social media. This may seem obvious stuff but
    in fact it is not. Often in group blogs it is very hard indeed to work
    out who has actually written the text, and the author name is buried
    away in an obscure corner. And very, very often in solo blogs, readers
    who arrive at a particular post from Google or social media then have to
    launch off on a prolonged search of obscure corners of the blog just to
    find out who the author is.
  • Because blog contents should be timely, make sure that the date for
    content displays prominently at the start of content. Don’t just put a
    date in an obscure way at the bottom of the post, or even in some
    separate listing of posts (as I’ve seen on some WordPress solo blogs).
    Clearly dating posts is especially important if the blog is dealing with
    fast-moving social developments, or an ever-changing research frontier
    in academia, where earlier content may be less valuable than the more
    recent material. And however fancy your blog design gets (e.g. with
    picture-based titles and rotating slides) make sure that when people
    reach it they can easily view it in a date-order format that will load
    quickly on a smart-phone or tablet. (This is a lesson we lost sight of
    in a recent LSE blog re-design, and we are now locked in to a elaborate
    format design that does not do this and will take us some time to
    rectify).
  • Remember the Web is a network, not a single-track railway line — and
    not everyone uses the web in the same way. So once you have a blog
    post, do everything you can to get the key content out to diverse
    readerships who want to see it. Post your links to Twitter (several
    times, at different times of the day) and Facebook, whose timestream
    format is excellent for blogposts. Let people subscribe by RSS or email.
  • Wherever possible deposit all blog content of lasting academic value
    in a university e-depository, so that it can be picked up and listed by
    Google Scholar. Any good multi-author blog run by academics or
    universities should already have a fully consistent stream of content,
    and so should already be depositing all blogposts. If you run a MAB and
    are not yet doing this, you’re missing a trick, so talk to your library
    about changing that. If you run a group or solo academic blog this may
    be more tricky because posts are often not that consistent in terms of
    length or the lasting academic value of the content, and your local
    e-depository may be correspondingly sniffier about hosting any
    materials. You need to find a way to select the best materials you have
    generated and talk to your library or e-depository about getting them
    permanently archived.
  • Talk to your readers. Encourage people to comment (but only post
    their comments after moderation) and respond to comments and to Tweets.
    Talk to people on Twitter and Facebook when they discuss your work. And
    be reciprocal, open-minded and fair in sharing your content with others
    and linking to their work — improving the public understanding of
    university research is a huge collective good for academics across all
    disciplines. We can all flourish together in the new paradigm for
    academic work.
I sincerely thank Chris Gilson, with whom I co-wrote an earlier version of many of the ideas in this post.


This piece originally appeared on the Writing for Research blog and is reposted with permission.


Note: This article gives the views of the authors, and not the
position of the Impact of Social Science blog, nor of the London School
of Economics. Please review our Comments Policy if you have any concerns on posting a comment below.



About the Author


Patrick Dunleavy is Professor of Political Science at the LSE and is Chair of the LSE Public Policy Group. He is well known for his book Authoring a PhD: How to plan, draft, write and finish a doctoral dissertation or thesis (Palgrave Macmillan, 2003).


Print Friendly

Impact of Social Sciences – Shorter, better, faster, free: Blogging changes the nature of academic research, not just how it is communicated

Friday, 19 December 2014

Digital tools for researchers | Connected Researchers

 Source: http://connectedresearchers.com/online-tools-for-researchers/




Digital tools for researchers







Find out how digital tools can help you:



explore
Data and code
Connect
At the bench
Write
Publish
Evaluate Research



———————————–
Explore the literature

(back to top)
icon_6918Here
is a collection of digital tools that are designed to help researchers
explore the millions of research articles available to this date. Search engines and curators help you to quickly find the articles you are interested in and stay up to date with the literature. Article visualization tools enhance your reading experience, for instance, by helping you navigate from a paper to another.
Search engines and curators
  • BibSonomy – Share bookmarks and lists of literature.
  • CiteUlike – Search, organize, and share scholarly papers.
  • Colwiz – Create citations and bibliography and set up your research groups on the cloud to share files and references.
  • ContentMine – Uses machines to liberate 100,000,000 facts from the scientific literature.
  • EvidenceFinder – Enriches your literature exploration by suggesting questions alongside your search results. (blog post)
  • F1000 – Leading biomedical experts helping scientists to discover, discuss and publish research.
  • Google Scholar – Provides a way to broadly search for scholarly literature across disciplines and sources.
  • LazyScholar – Chrome extension to help your literature search.
  • Mendeley – A unique platform comprising a social network, reference manager, article visualization tools.
  • Microsoft Academic Search – Find information about academic papers, authors, conferences, journals, and organizations from multiple sources.
  • MyScienceWork – Diffuse scientific information and knowledge in a free and accessible way.
  • Nowomics – Follow genes, proteins and processes to keep up with the latest papers and data relevant to your research.
  • Paperity – Aggregator of open access papers and journals Search engines and curators.
  • Paperscape – Visualise the arXiv, an open, online repository for scientific research papers.
  • PubChase – Life sciences and medical literature recommendations engine. (blog post)
  • Pubget – Search engine for life-science PDFs.
  • PubPeer – Search for publications and provide feedback and/or start a conversation anonymously.
  • ReadCube – Read, manage & discover new literature.
  • Scicurve – Transforms systematic literature review into interactive and comprehensible environment.
  • Sciencescape – Innovation in the exploration of papers and authors.
  • Scientific Journal Finder - Search engine, which recommends a list of journals based on title and abstract of scientific manuscript.
  • Scizzle – Curator that automagically finds new and relevant research papers. (blog post)
  • Sparrho – Personalised recommendation engine for science – allowing you to keep a bird’s eye view on all things scientific.
  • SSRN – Multi-disciplinary online repository of scholarly research and related materials in social sciences.
  • Wiki Journal Club – Open, user-reviewed summaries of the top studies in medical research.
  • Zotero – Helps you collect, organize, cite, and share your research sources.
Article visualization
  • ACS ChemWorx – Collaborative reference manager coupled with tools and services for authors.
  • Colwiz – Create citations and bibliography and set up your research groups on the cloud to share files and references.
  • eLife Lens – Provides for researchers, reviewers, authors and readers a novel way of looking at online content.
  • Elsevier “Article of the Future” – Aims to revolutionize the format of the academic paper in regard to presentation, content and context.
  • Interactive Science Publishing – Allows authors to publish large datasets with original source data that can be viewed interactively by readers.
  • Mendeley – A platform comprising a social network, reference manager, article visualization tools.
  • Pubget – Search engine for life-science PDFs.
  • PubReader - Alternative web presentation that offers another, more reader-friendly way to read literature in PMC and Bookshelf.
  • ReadCube – Read, manage & discover new literature.
  • Utopia Docs – Pdf reader that connects the static content of scientific articles to the dynamic world of online content.
  • Wiley Anywhere Article – Enhanced HTML article from Whiley publisher.
  • Wiley Smart Article – Enhanced article tools for chemistry content in Whiley journals.


———————————–
Find and share data and code

(back to top)
icon_21297Managing
large sets of data and programing code is already unavoidable for most
researchers. Tools have been developed to efficiently store and share
data and code. These tools are become increasingly important as data and
code sharing becomes the norm and a requirement of most funding
agencies.
  • BioLINCC – Clinical specimen database.
  • ContentMine – Uses machines to liberate 100,000,000 facts from the scientific literature.
  • DataBank – Analysis and visualisation tool that contains collections of time series data on a variety of topics.
  • DataCite – Establish easier access to research data by providing persistent identifiers for data.
  • DataHub – Publish or register datasets, create and manage groups and communities
  • Dataverse Network – Harvard-based tool to share, cite, reuse and archive research data.
  • Dryad- Data repository for any files associated with any published article in the sciences or medicine.
  • Figshare – Manage your research in the cloud and control who you share it with or make it publicly available and citable
  • GenBank – Gene sequence database provided by the National Center for Biotechnology Information.
  • GitHub – Online software project hosting using the Git revision control system.
  • Nowomics – Follow genes, proteins and processes to keep up with the latest papers and data relevant to your research.
  • Open Science Framework – Gathers a network of research documents, a version control system, and a collaboration software.
  • Peer Evaluation – Open repository for data, papers, media coupled with an open review and discussion platform.
  • Quip – Combines chat, documents, spreadsheets, checklist, and more to collaborate on any device.
  • re3data – Global registry of research data repositories.
  • Research Compendia – Tools for researchers to connect their data, code and computational methods to their published research
  • SlideShare – Community for sharing presentations and other professional content
  • Socialsci – Help researchers collect data for their surveys and experiments (blog post).
  • Zenodo – A home for the long-tail of science, enabling researchers to share and preserve any research outputs.


———————————–
Connect with others

(back to top)
icon_3683Research cannot stay buried in the lab anymore! Under Connect with experts and researchers,
you will find a set of tools that help researchers reach out to other
researcher and find expertise for new collaborations. Under Outreach, find tools that help you communicate your research to the general public. Citizen science,
gathers tools to help you involve the general public in your research
efforts, by sharing CPU time, or counting birds for example. And under Crowdfunding, you will find tools that help you collect funds for research from others.
Connect with experts and researchers
  • Academia – A place to share and follow research and researchers.
  • AcademicJoy – Share research ideas and story in research and innovation.
  • Addgene – Connect with other researchers through this plasmid sharing platform.
  • AssayDepot – Pharmaceutical marketplace for life science research services.
  • Benchling – Life science data management and collaboration platform.
  • BiomedExperts – Scientific social network to research, collaborate, and connect with researchers and medical experts worldwide.
  • Cureus – A free and open access the medical journal and a place for physicians to build a digital CV.
  • Direct2experts – A federated network of biomedical research expertise.
  • Expertnet – Helps you locate experts in Florida universities.
  • GlobalEventList – A comprehensive directory of scientific events worldwide.
  • Kaggle – Connect with organisation in need of data prediction algorithms through open competitions for the best code. (blog post)
  • LabRoots – Social network for researchers.
  • Linkedin – Professional networking site for all.
  • MalariaWorld – The world’s scientific and social network for malaria professionals.
  • Mendeley – A unique platform comprising a social network, reference manager, article visualization tools
  • MyScienceWork – Diffuse scientific information and knowledge in a free and accessible way.
  • nanoHUB – Centralized platform for computational nanotechnology research, education, and collaboration.
  • Open Science Framework – Gathers a network of research documents, a version control system, and a collaboration software.
  • ResearchGate – Social network for researchers.
  • ScienceExchange – Marketplace for shared lab instrumentations.
  • SocialScienceSpace – Social network to bring for social scientists
  • Zombal – Connects the scientific community globally for scientific outsourcing
Outreach
  • AcademicJoy – Sharing research ideas and story in research and innovation.
  • I Am Scientist – A science outreach education and engagement activity.
  • nanoHUB – Centralized platform for computational nanotechnology research, education, and collaboration.
  • Publiscize – Empowering scientists to free science and make their research available to everyone.
  • ScienceGist – Simplified summaries of scientific papers. (blog post)
  • SciVee – Science video sharing platform.
  • Useful Science – Summaries of the latest science useful in life.
Citizen science
  • Folding@home – Distributed computing project which studies protein folding, misfolding, aggregation, and related diseases.
  • Kaggle – Platform for data prediction competitions.
  • Project Noah – Explore and document wildlife on this citizen scientists platform.
  • SciStarter – Find, join, and contribute to science through recreational activities and citizen science research projects.
  • SETI@home – Put your CPU to work to help detect intelligent life outside Earth.
  • Zooniverse – Citizen science projects using the efforts and ability of volunteers to help scientists and researchers.
Crowdfunding
  • Experiment – Crowdfunding Platform for Scientific Research.
  • My Projects – Donate to the research work that means the most to you.
  • Petridish – Fund science & explore the world with renowned researchers.
  • SciFlies – Allows anyone, anywhere to directly support research they care about.
  • Consano – Research crowdfunding site to directly support innovative medical research that matters to you


———————————–
At the bench and in the office

(back to top)
icon_26055Here is a collection of tools that help researchers in their everyday tasks. Go to Lab and project management,
for tools that help manage stocks and equipments in the lab as well as
project management tools for research. You’ll also find a selection of Electronic lab notebooks developed with academic researchers in mind first. Many others are available elsewhere. Outsourcing experiments
is increasingly common in academic research, in part thanks to several
sites that are making it easier and cheaper. Platforms to Find and share samples help you disseminate and find materials and biological samples. Under Protocol repository, you will find a collection of publicly accessible resource for experimental protocols. Work with code gathers tools designed to make the coder’s life easier and Work with data tools to generate and analyze data sets, including many R-based tools.
Lab and project management

  • 1degreebio – Reagent marketplace.
  • ELabInventory – Web-based laboratory inventory management system designed for life science research laboratories
  • LabCritics – Provides researchers with a trust-able source of lab equipment reviews and comparisons.
  • LabGuru – Supports day to day activities of a research group, from vision to execution, from knowledge to logistics.
  • Life technologies Lab Management Tool – Management tool for lab equipment and services.
  • Open Science Framework – Gathers a network of research documents, a version control system, and a collaboration software.
  • Quartzy – A free and easy way to manage your lab.
  • Quip – Combines chat, documents, spreadsheets, checklist, and more to collaborate on any device.
  • StrainControl – Lab management tools that allows you to organize strains, plasmids, oligos, antibodies, chemicals and inventorie.
  • Synapse – Platform to support open, collaborative data analysis for clear, reproducible science
Electronic lab notebook

  • Docollab – Helps you manage your scientific research, collaborate with your colleagues and publish your findings.
  • elabftw – Electromic lab notebook made by researchers, for researchers, with usability in mind.
  • Findings App – Lab notebook app that allows to organize your experiments, keep track of results, and manage your protocols.
  • Hivebench – Hosted numeric laboratory notebook tool to manage protocols, experiments and share them with your team.
  • Journal Lab – A community of scientists who share open summaries and peer review of published articles. (blog post)
  • LabArchives – Web-based product to enable researchers to store, organize, and publish their research data.
  • Labfolder – Simple way to document your research and to organize your protocols and data. (blog post)
  • LabGuru – Supports day to day activities of a research group, from vision to execution, from knowledge to logistics.
  • Laboratory Logbook – Document projects running in a lab and manage experimentally obtained data and its metadata.
  • Sumatra – Automated electronic lab notebook for computational projects.
Outsourcing experiments

  • ScienceExchange – Marketplace for shared lab instrumentations.
  • Transcriptic – A remote, on-demand robotic life science research lab with no hardware to buy or software to install.
  • Zombal – Connects the scientific community globally for scientific outsourcing
Find and share samples

  • Addgene – Plasmid sharing platform
  • Biospecimens – Platform for biospecimen-based research.
  • Duke human heart - Repository for cardiovascular research scientists, including tissues samples and information.
  • ELabInventory – Web-based laboratory inventory management system designed for life science research laboratories.
  • Nanosupply – Platform facilitating sourcing and sharing of advanced materials for research and education.
  • Sample of Science – Peer-Sharing Platform for Scientific Samples. (blog post)
Protocol repository

  • SciVee – Science video sharing platform that includes protocols.
  • Benchling – Life science data management and collaboration platform, where you can create, find, and discuss protocols.
  • IPOL journal - Research journal of image processing and image analysis with algorithm descriptions and its source code.
  • MyExperiment – Share workflows and in silico experiments.
  • OpenWetWare – Share information, know-how, wisdom, and protocols among researchers working in biological fields.
  • Pegasus – Platform that help workflow-based applications execute.
  • Protocols – Crowdsourced universal protocol repository. (blog post)
  • Protocol online – A curator of protocols contributed by researchers arounds the world.
  • Benchfly – Video protocols and video platform for scientists.
Work with code

  • CDE Tool - Deploy and run your Linux programs on other machines without any installation or configuration.
  • Dexy -Helps your code to speak for itself with beautiful syntax highlighting.
  • iPython notebook – Interactive computational environment that allows code execution, text, mathematics, plots, and rich media.
  • Kepler – Helps create, execute, and share models and analyses across scientific and engineering disciplines.
  • Mercurial – Control management tool with distributed source, giving each developer a local copy of the development history.
  • nanoHUB – Centralized platform for computational nanotechnology research, education, and collaboration.
  • ROpenSci – Packages that allow access to data repositories through the R statistical programming environment.
  • Sweave – Allows to embed the R code for complete data analyses in latex documents
  • System in Cloud – Platform, enabling clients to rapidly draw and execute data-flow diagram that run in cloud.
Work with data

  • Benchling – Life science data management and collaboration platform.
  • Galaxy Project – Web-based platform for data intensive biomedical research.
  • GenePattern – Genomic analysis platform that provides access to hundreds of genomics tools.
  • GenomeCompiler – Genetic design platform allowing researchers to manipulate and design everything from single genes to entire genomes.
  • Kaggle – Patform for data prediction competitions.
  • Kitware – Advanced software solutions and services for data intensive R&D
  • mloss – Machine learning open source software.
  • MyExperiment – Share workflows and in silico experiments
  • nanoHUB – Centralized platform for computational nanotechnology research, education, and collaboration.
  • Pegasus – Platform that help workflow-based applications execute.
  • Plotly – Online tool to graph and share data.
  • ROpenSci – Packages that allow access to data repositories through the R statistical programming environment.
  • Statcrunch  – Provides data analysis via the Web.
  • Sumatra – Automated electronic lab notebook for computational projects
  • SURF In context – Navigate through RDF relations in a smooth and understandable way.
  • Sweave – Allows to embed the R code for complete data analyses in latex documents.
  • Synapse – Platform to support open, collaborative data analysis for clear, reproducible science.
  • System in Cloud – Platform, enabling clients to rapidly draw and execute data-flow diagram that run in cloud.
  • Tableau – Easily and quickly analyze and present data and share insights.
  • Taverna – A suite of tools used to design and execute scientific workflows.
  • VisTrails – Scientific workflow and provenance management system that supports data exploration and visualization.
  • Wakari – Web-based python data analysis.
  • WebPlotDigitizer – Web based tool to extract data from plots, images, and maps. (blog post)
  • Wings – Semantic workflow system that assists scientists with the design of computational experiments.
  • Wolfram Alpha – Web-based tools for scientific calculations.
  • World Map – Allows users to explore, visualize, edit, collaborate with, and publish geospatial information.


———————————–
icon_43189Writing tools are adapting to the needs of researchers. Tools to store and manage references are grouped under Reference managers. And with research being more and more dependent on collaborations across labs and continents, collaborative writing tools, help researchers write their manuscript while keeping close track of the modifications done by others to the text.
Reference managers
  • ACS ChemWorx – Collaborative reference manager coupled with tools and services for authors.
  • CiteUlike – Search, organize, and share scholarly papers.
  • Colwiz – Create citations and bibliography and set up your research groups on the cloud to share files and references.
  • EndNote - Software tool for publishing and managing bibliographies, citations and references
  • Mendeley – A unique platform comprising a social network, reference manager, article visualization tools.
  • Paperpile – No-fuss reference management for the web (Google docs plugin). (blog post)
  • Papers – Helps you collect and curate the research material that you’re passionate about.
  • Zotero – Helps you collect, organize, cite, and share your research sources
Collaborative writing tools
  • ASCII doctor - Text processor & publishing toolchain for converting AsciiDoc to HTML5, DocBook & more.
  • Atlas – Write, collaborate, design and publish on a single platform.
  • Authorea – Platform to write scientific, academic, and technical documents in collaboration. (blog post)
  • Draft – Version control and collaboration to improve your writing.
  • Fidus Writer – Online collaborative editor especially made for academics who need to use citations and/or formulas.
  • Penflip – Collaborative writing and version control. (blog post)
  • SciGit – Change tracking solution for effortless collaborative writing. (blog post)
  • ShareLaTex – Collaborative on-line editor for for Maths or Sciences.
  • WriteLaTex – Online collaborative LaTeX editor.
  • Stackedit – Markdown editor based on PageDown, the Markdown library used by Stack Overflow.
  • Typewrite – A simple, real-time collaborative writing environment.
  • Poetica – Get clear feedback, wherever you’re writing.
  • Quip – Combines chat, documents, spreadsheets, checklist, and more to collaborate on any device.
Manuscript Services and writing assistant tools (to come)
  • Writefull – Provides feedback on your writing using data from the Google Books database. (blog post)


———————————–
icon_41537Open Access platforms
offer an alternative publishing model, allowing anyone to visualize
published work for free. Researchers can also maximize the exposure of
their work by placing their manuscripts in Paper repositories.
In addition to becoming more open, articles are bound to become more
interactive. A set of tools allowing you to bring additional
functionalities such as executable code to your articles are grouped
under Support to publication. You can also find tools to help your choose from the thousands of journals in activity under Journal reviews and advisors.
Open access platforms
  • eLife – Open access to the most promising advances in science.
  • F1000 – Leading biomedical experts helping scientists to discover, discuss and publish research.
  • GigaScience – Online open-access open-data journal that publishes ‘big-data’ studies from the life and biomedical sciences.
  • Limn – Free journal that outlines contemporary problems.
  • PeerJ – Open access pre-print and publishing of life science research with annotation.
  • Cureus – A free and open access the medical journal and a place for physicians to build a digital CV.
  • ScienceOpen – Freely accessible research network to share and evaluate scientific information.
  • The Winnower – Open access online science publishing platform that employs open post-publication peer review.
Paper repositories
  • ArXiv – E-prints in Physics, Mathematics, Computer Science, Quantitative Biology, Quantitative Finance and Statistics.
  • biorXiv – The preprint server for Biology.
  • F1000 – Leading biomedical experts helping scientists to discover, discuss and publish research.
  • Figshare – Manage your research in the cloud and control who you share it with or make it publicly available and citable.
  • Peer Evaluation – Open repository for data, papers, media coupled with an open review and discussion platform.
  • Peerage of Science – Pre-publication peer review and publishing for scientific articles.
  • PeerJ PrePrints - Pre-print repository for the biological and medical Sciences.
  • SlideShare – Community for sharing presentations and other professional content.
  • Zenodo – A home for the long-tail of science, enabling researchers to share and preserve any research outputs.
Support to publication
  • Collage Authoring Environment – Framework for collaborative preparation and publication of so-called executable paper.
  • Exec&Share – Openly share the code and data that underlie your research publications.
  • Google Charts - Create live and interactive charts in your browser.
  • RunMyCode – Openly share the code and data that underlie your research publications. (blog post)
  • ORCID – Provides a persistent digital identifier that distinguishes you from every other researcher.
Journal reviews and advisors
  • Edanz’s journal advisor – Personal guide that recommends the tools and services you need to get published.
  • Journal Guide – Find the best journal for your research. (blog post)
  • RoMEO – Find out publisher copyright and self-archiving policies.
  • SciRev – Share your experience with the scientific review process and learn from others to decide where to submit your manuscripts. (blog post)


———————————–
Evaluate research

(back to top)
icon_16325New
tools are changing the way research in evaluated, both in terms of the
scientific value of articles and the overall achievements of
researchers. Find under Peer-review, a collection of
tools that are changing the peer-review system into a more open and
productive process by bypassing journals and editors. Altmetrics are a set of new tools that analyze the impact of you work by other means than impact factor and citations counts.

Peer-review

  • F1000 – Leading biomedical experts helping scientists to discover, discuss and publish research.
  • Hypothes.is – Sentence-level peer-review to provide commentary, references, and insight on top of online content.
  • Libre – Participative reviewing platform
  • Paper Critics – Review platform for research publications (Mendeley plugin).
  • Peerage of Science - Pre-publication peer review and publishing for scientific articles.
  • PeerJ - Open access pre-print and publishing of life science research with annotation.
  • PubPeer – Search for publications and provide feedback and/or start a conversation anonymously.
  • Publons – Record, showcase, and verify all your peer review activity.
  • Pubmed Commons – Share opinions and information about scientific publications in PubMed. (blog post)
  • Rubriq – Provides an independent peer review prior to submission. (blog post)
  • ScienceOpen – Freely accessible research network to share and evaluate scientific information.
  • Wiki Journal Club – Open, user-reviewed summaries of the top studies in medical research.
  • The Winnower – Open access online science publishing platform that employs open post-publication peer review.
Altmetrics

  • Altmetric – Tracks what people are saying about papers online on behalf of publishers, authors, libraries and institutions.
  • ImpactStory – Share the full story of your research impact. (blog post)
  • PLOS Article-Level Metrics – A suite of established metrics that measure the overall performance and reach of research articles.
  • PlumAnalytics - Research altmetric service tracking more than 20 different types of artifacts.
  • Publons – Record, showcase, and verify all your peer review activity.


Digital tools for researchers | Connected Researchers

Wednesday, 17 December 2014

Contribution of information and communication technology (ICT) in country'S H-index

Contribution of information and communication technology (ICT) in country'S H-index

Farhadi, M.; Salehi, H.; Embi, M.A.; Fooladi, M.; Farhadi, H.; Aehaei Chadegani, A.; Ale Ebrahim, N. (2013) Contribution of information and communication technology (ICT) in country'S H-index. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology, 57 (1). pp. 122-127. ISSN 1992-8645
[img] PDF - Published Version [error in script]
Download (140Kb) | Preview

Abstract

The
aim of this study is to examine the effect of Information and
Communication Technology (ICT) development on country's scientific
ranking as measured by H-index. Moreover, this study applies ICT
development sub-indices including ICT Use, ICT Access and ICT skill to
find the distinct effect of these sub-indices on country's H-index. To
this purpose, required data for the panel of 14 Middle East countries
over the period 1995 to 2009 is collected. Findings of the current study
show that ICT development increases the H-index of the sample
countries. The results also indicate that ICT Use and ICT Skill
sub-indices positively contribute to higher H-index but the effect of
ICT access on country's H-index is not clear.
Item Type: Article
Creators:
  1. Farhadi, M.
  2. Salehi, H.
  3. Embi, M.A.
  4. Fooladi, M.
  5. Farhadi, H.
  6. Aehaei Chadegani, A.
  7. Ale Ebrahim, N.
Journal or Publication Title: Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology
Uncontrolled Keywords: Information and Communication Technology (ICT) development, H-index, Middle East
Subjects: A General Works
H Social Sciences > H Social Sciences (General)
H Social Sciences > HB Economic Theory
L Education > L Education (General)
T Technology > T Technology (General)
Divisions: Faculty of Engineering
Depositing User: Dr. Nader Ale Ebrahim
Date Deposited: 17 Dec 2014 09:03
Last Modified: 17 Dec 2014 09:03
URI: http://eprints.um.edu.my/id/eprint/8547


UM Research Repository

RESEARCH MANAGEMENT CENTRE (RMC) - the feedback form from the participants of Scientific Writing Seminar









Dear
Dr. Nader,

Kindly
be informed, RMC has analysed the feedback form from the participants of
Scientific Writing Seminar in order to find out what the participant really liked
about the seminar and what could be improved.

Below
is the feedback received from the participant for your session.






Thank
you.

--
Research
Management Centre (RMC)
Faculty
of Medicine
University
of Malaya
50603
Kuala Lumpur
Office
: 03-79677515
Fax
   : 03-79568841
 




RESEARCH MANAGEMENT CENTRE (RMC)