Sunday, 25 October 2020

The effect of Open access (OA)

 Source: http://www.openaccessweek.org/photo/the-effect-of-open-access-oa?xg_source=msg_appr_photo

In all of my presentations during the Open access week 2020

Views: 14

View Full Size

 

Current Status of Systemic Drug Delivery Research: A Bibliometric Study

 Source: https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-54490-4_2

Current Status of Systemic Drug Delivery Research: A Bibliometric Study

  • Saba Ale Ebrahim
  • Maysam Zamani PedramEmail author
  • Nader Ale Ebrahim
  • Saba Ale Ebrahim
    • 1
    • 2
  • Maysam Zamani Pedram
    • 2
    • 3
    Email author
  • Nader Ale Ebrahim
    • 4
  1. 1.Faculty of Electrical EngineeringIran University of Science and TechnologyTehranIran
  2. 2.Faculty of Electrical EngineeringK.N. Toosi University of TechnologyTehranIran
  3. 3.Department of Mechanical and Manufacturing EngineeringUniversity of CalgaryCalgaryCanada
  4. 4.Research and Technology DepartmentAlzahra UniversityVanak, TehranIran
Chapter
  • 4 Downloads
Part of the Healthy Ageing and Longevity book series (HAL, volume 13)

Abstract

The previous chapter has presented an overview of the roles and limitations of systemic delivery in anti-ageing medicine. This chapter will examine the publication trend of research in systemic drug delivery by using a bibliometric approach. The data will be collected from the Scopus database to study the research trend from 1974 to 2019, and will be analyzed using network analysis of research outputs. Journals that have published related articles will be analyzed based on a diverse range of factors (including document citations, countries, topics and keywords). According to the publication trend identified, research in systemic drug delivery is a hotspot. With the bibliometric study presented, this chapter will offer an overview of the current status and future directions of research in systemic drug delivery.

Keywords

Publication trend Bibliometrics Drug delivery Literature research Research direction 

Notes

Glossary

Bibliometrics

Adiscipline in which the progress of a given discipline is studied, evaluated and monitored by applying mathematical and statistical methods to analyse publications.

Databases

Structured collections of data.

Dendrogram

A type of diagrams displaying the results of hierarchical clustering.

Hirsch index

Serves as an alternative to traditional journal impact factor metrics for the evaluation of the impact of the work done by a particular researcher.

PRISMA

A set of guidelines governing the items to be reported in systematic reviews and meta-analyses.

Pubmed

A database developed by the National Center for Biotechnology Information at the National Library of Medicine.

R tool

A software for statistical computing and graphic plotting.

Scientometrics

A discipline to quantitative study science, communication in science, and science policy.

Scopus

An indexing database held by Elsevier, containing abstracts and citations for journal articles, book chapters and conference papers.

Web of science

An indexing database within Web of Knowledge. It is held by Thomson Reuters.

References

  1. Aghaei Chadegani A, Salehi H, Yunus MM, Farhadi H, Fooladi M, Farhadi M et al (2013) A comparison between two main academic literature collections: web of science and scopus databases. Asian Soc Sci 9:18–26Google Scholar
  2. Ale Ebrahim S, Ashtari A, Pedram MZ, Ale EN (2019) Publication trends in drug delivery and magnetic nanoparticles. Nanoscale Res Lett 14:164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anselmo AC, Gokarn Y, Mitragotri S (2019) Non-invasive delivery strategies for biologics. Nat Rev Drug Discov 18:19–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Aria M, Cuccurullo C (2017) bibliometrix: an R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. J Informetrics 11:959–975CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bhagwat RR, Vaidhya IS (2013) Novel drug delivery systems: an overview. Int J Pharm Sci Res 4:970–982Google Scholar
  6. Das A-K (2015) Introduction to research evaluation metrics and related indicators. In: Sen BK, Mishra S (Eds) Research evaluation metrics. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, FranceGoogle Scholar
  7. Davidson PM, Newton PJ, Ferguson C, Daly J, Elliott D, Homer C et al (2014) Rating and ranking the role of bibliometrics and webometrics in nursing and midwifery. Sci World J.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/135812CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Eckman WW, Patlak CS, Fenstermacher JD (1974) A critical evaluation of the principles governing the advantages of intra-arterial infusions. J Pharmacokinet Biopharm 2:257–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Floriano JF, de Barros NR, Cinman JLF, da Silva RG, Loffredo AV, Borges FA et al (2017) Ketoprofen loaded in natural rubber latex transdermal patch for tendinitis treatment. J Polym Environ 26:2281–2289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gagliardi A, Paolino D, Iannone M, Palma E, Fresta M, Cosco D (2018) Sodium deoxycholate-decorated zein nanoparticles for a stable colloidal drug delivery system. Int J Nanomed 13:601–614CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ghanbari Baghestan A, Khaniki H, Kalantari A, Akhtari-Zavare M, Farahmand E, Tamam E et al (2019) A crisis in “open access”: should communication scholarly outputs take 77 years to become open access? SAGE Open 9:1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Harzing A-W (2019) Two new kids on the block: how do crossref and dimensions compare with Google Scholar, Microsoft Academic, Scopus and the Web of Science? Scientometrics 120:341–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Huang Y, Ma J, Porter AL, Kwon S, Zhu D (2015) Analyzing collaboration networks and developmental patterns of nano-enabled drug delivery (NEDD) for brain cancer. Beilstein J Nanotechnol 6:1666–1676CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hu D, Li T, Xu Z, Liu D, Yang M, Zhu L (2018) Self-stabilized silk sericin-based nanoparticles: In vivo biocompatibility and reduced doxorubicin-induced toxicity. Acta Biomater 74:385–396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jamali SM, Md Zain AN, Samsudin MA, Ale EN (2015) Publication trends in physics education: a bibliometric study. J Educ Res 35:19–36Google Scholar
  16. Jia H-R, Zhu Y-X, Xu K-F, Liu X, Wu F-G (2018) Plasma membrane-anchorable photosensitizing nanomicelles for lipid raft-responsive and light-controllable intracellular drug delivery. J Control Release 286:103–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Klemetsrud T, Kjøniksen A-L, Hiorth M, Jacobsen J, Smistad G (2018) Polymer coated liposomes for use in the oral cavity—a study of the in vitro toxicity, effect on cell permeability and interaction with mucin. J Liposome Res 28:62–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Liu J-M, Zhang D-D, Fang G-Z, Wang S (2018) Erythrocyte membrane bioinspired near-infrared persistent luminescence nanocarriers for in vivo long-circulating bioimaging and drug delivery. Biomaterials 165:39–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ma J, Porter AL, Aminabhavi TM, Zhu D (2015) Nano-enabled drug delivery systems for brain cancer and Alzheimer’s disease: research patterns and opportunities. Nanomedicine 11:1763–1771CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG (2009) Group atP. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Annal Intern Med 151:264–269Google Scholar
  21. Nag O, Naciri J, Erickson J, Oh E, Delehanty J (2018) Hybrid liquid crystal nanocarriers for enhanced zinc phthalocyanine-mediated photodynamic therapy. Bioconjug Chem 29Google Scholar
  22. Nordin N, Samsudin M-A, Abdul-Khalid S-N, Ale EN (2019) Firms’ sustainable practice research in developing countries: mapping the cited literature by Bibliometric analysis approach. Int J Sustain Strateg Manag 7:5–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Park K (2014) Controlled drug delivery systems: past forward and future back. J Control Release 190:3–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Pitchaimani A, Nguyen T, Aryal S (2018) Natural killer cell membrane infused biomimetic liposomes for targeted tumor therapy. Biomaterials 160:124–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Robert C, Wilson CS, Venuta A, Ferrari M, Arreto CD (2017) Evolution of the scientific literature on drug delivery: a 1974–2015 bibliometric study. J Control Release 260:226–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Shahrezaei M, Oryan A, Bastami F, Hosseinpour S, Shahrezaee M, Kamali A (2018) Comparative impact of systemic delivery of atorvastatin, simvastatin, and lovastatin on bone mineral density of the ovariectomized rats. Endocrine 60:138–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Sørli JB, Balogh Sivars K, Da Silva E, Hougaard KS, Koponen IK, Zuo YY et al (2018) Bile salt enhancers for inhalation: correlation between in vitro and in vivo lung effects. Int J Pharm 550:114–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Svenson S (2004) Carrier-based drug delivery. American Chemical Society, WashingtonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Wilson E, Luft J, DeSimone J (2018) Formulation of high-performance dry powder aerosols for pulmonary protein delivery. Pharm Res 35:195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Yoo Y, Yoon S-J, Kim S, Lee D-W, Um S, Hyun H et al (2018) A local drug delivery system based on visible light-cured glycol chitosan and doxorubicin⋅hydrochloride for thyroid cancer treatment in vitro and in vivo. Drug Deliv 25:1664–1671CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Friday, 23 October 2020

What does it mean to be Open?

 Source:  https://plos.org/open-access-week/

 

What does it mean to be Open?

This Open Access Week, we celebrate the role of Open Access in making peer reviewed research more accessible, more equitable, and more transparent.

At PLOS, Open means your research is available immediately and to everyone. Permanently. No embargos, no reader fees, no limits on accessibility. Authors choose Open for greater visibility and more freedom in how they share their work with colleagues, policymakers, and new collaborators. But Open also means the flexibility to share early and accelerate collaboration. The choice to make your work more transparent. Learn more about the benefits of Openness.

When you publish
Open Access
you get
cited more.

When you publish
Open Access
your work
shapes public policy.

With
Open Access
you can share
your research faster.

Open Access
increases
international collaboration.

Publishing
Open Data
increases trust
in your research.

Tell us
why you
choose
Open Access.

When you Open your research
you drive science forward.

 

Research Visibility and Impact By: Nader Ale Ebrahim

 Source: https://www.linkedin.com/posts/aleebrahim_researchimpact-researchtools-researchvisibility-activity-6723719376886910976-iALC

 

Research 123

 Source: https://iesresearch.solutions/research-123-by-vietnam-national-agency-for-science-and-technology-ministry-of-science-and-technology-and-ies/

“Research 123”

Thanks to success of training workshop “Research 123” with some students got published internationally in 2017, we are please to announce the recruitment plan for the training workshop series “Research 123” by Vietnam National Agency for Science and Technology, Ministry of Science and Technology and IES (Innovative Education Service) with advanced program designs to cover most of student’s research levels and objectives.

“Research 123” from October to December, 2018 will be the promised training workshop to help the scientist and researcher enhance the skill to research and write paper as well improve the visibility and impact factor of research paper.

  1. Objectives
  • Enhance the necessary skills to conduct a research and write a paper following the international standard.
  • Consult and build strategy to international publish, outreach and dissemination.
  • Expand the international research networking and cooperation.
  • Provide some tips to improve the visibility and impact factor of research paper
  • Guide to use research tools and research application such as database, reference management, and originality check.
  1. Who should participate?
  • Scientist, Researcher, Lecturer, PhD and Master Student
  • Research institution staff and Librarian.
  • Manager and Administrator of research office
  1. Location and Time

Building A2, National Economics University

207 Giai Phong Road, Dong Tam Ward, Hai Ba Trung District, Hanoi

Roadmap 1: 30th– 31th, October 2018.

Roadmap 2: Week 26-30, November 2018

Roadmap 3: Week 10-14, December 2018

  1. Speaker
  • Wong Woei Fuh – Director of Innovative Education Services, iGroup Asia Pacific. He is consulting expertise in the area of scientific research, innovation outreaching and information industry. With many years of experience working for Thomson Reuters, now he is the consultant of many education and research projects such as Lifelong Learning Institute (Singapore), Research Excellence (Tenaga University, Melaca University of Technology, Malaysia).
  • Nader Ale Ebrahim – Dr. Nader is currently a “Research Visibility and Impact” freelancer consultant. He was working as a visiting research fellow with the Centre for Research Services, Institute of Management and Research Services (IPPP), University of Malaya from 2013 to November 2017. His current research interests are Open access, Research visibility, Research Tools, and Bibliometrics. Dr. Nader is well known as the creator of “Research Tools” Box and the developer of “Publication Marketing Tools”. He has so far conducted over 330 workshops within and outside of University of Malaya, and has published more than 100 papers and presented in several journals and conferences.
  • Vuong Quan Hoang – Research and Speaker. Dr. Hoang has many years of experience research in academic and government sector such as World Bank, IFC, ING Bank, FPT University, Ho Chi Minh Open University. He is in the top researcher of Vietnam with more than 50 papers has been published in ISI and Scopus journals.
  • Pham Hung Hiep – Research and Speaker. Graduated in Chinese Culture University, Taipei, his research interest focuses in Research and Education, Bibliometrics. Dr. Hiep has many papers in Scopus/SSCI index, and he is the co-author of some books about Higher Education published by Springer and Sense.
  • Han Wen Chang – Research Consultant and Analysis, IES. Dr. Chang was the analysis expertise of Thomson Reuters and has many years of experience with many prestigious universities in Taipei, Singapore, South Korea and Hong Kong. Her consulting in the area of data and information analysis, solution to improve research outreach and visibility of research paper for many universities, research institutions and R&D in the region.
  1. Training program

Research Best Practice

  • Month 1: The Concept of Research Best Practices. Research tools and application. Definition and application of bibliometrics in research.
  • Month 2: Research Method. International Standard of Research Quality. Research Plan and Practice. Good Manuscript Writing. Peer Review Process.
  • Month 3: Concept of Research Outreach. Practical Session of Plain Language Summary. Concept of Research Impact & Impact Evidences. Story Telling through Infographics.

       Research Advancement

  • Month 1: Strategic Planning for Research Milestones. Bibliometrics, Altmetrics and Data Analytics. Research Communication.
  • Month 2: Research Cluster Management and Leadership. Impactful Research Communication. Assignment Review.
  1. Registration and Contact

RESEARCH 123 Registration Form

Unit*:……………………………………………………………………………………………..

Address*:……………………………………

Name*:……………………………………….

Title*………………………………………….

Email*:…………………………………….. Mobile*:………………………………………………

Fax:…………………………………………… Tel*………………………………………………

CODE for discount 10%: IGVN2018 (deadline by Oct 15th)

  • If participant have any question, please do not hesitate to contact:

Email: daotao@vista.gov.vn/ thuy.nguyen@igroupnet.com

Hotline: (84) 987 893 813