Friday, 14 August 2015

Upskill Programme: Introduction to the “Research Tools”

Upskill Programme: Introduction to the “Research Tools”

Title : Introduction to the “Research Tools”
Speaker : Dr. Nader Ale Ebrahim
Date : 21 August 2015 (Friday)
Time : 9.00am – 12.00pm
Venue : Computer Lab, Level 4, Institute of Graduate Studies
Max. No. of Participants : 40
Never submit passwords through Google Forms.


Upskill Programme: Introduction to the “Research Tools”

Upskill Programme: Introduction to the “Research Tools”









Dear All Postgraduate Candidates,

Greetings
from Institute of Graduate Studies!

We
are pleased to announce that we are organizing a workshop for the
month of August 2015 . Details of the workshop are as
follows:


                        Title
                     
               : Introduction to the
“Research Tools”
                       
Speaker                    
           : Dr. Nader Ale Ebrahim
                       
Date                    
                 : 21 August 2015
(Friday)
                       
Time                    
                : 9.00am – 12.00pm
                       
Venue                    
              : Computer Lab, Level 4,
Institute of Graduate Studies    
 
          Max. No. of Participants    
     : 40
                          

Introduction:

“Research Tools” can be
defined as vehicles that broadly facilitate research and related activities.
Scientific tools enable researchers to collect, organize, analyze, visualize
and publicized research  outputs. Dr. Nader has collected over 700 tools
that enable students to follow the correct path in research and to ultimately
produce high-quality research outputs with more accuracy and efficiency. It is
assembled as an interactive Web-based mind map, titled “Research Tools”, which
is updated periodically. “Research Tools” consists of a hierarchical set
of nodes. It has four main nodes: (1) Searching the literature, (2)
Writing a paper, (3) Targeting suitable journals, and  (4) Enhancing
visibility and impact of the research, and six auxiliary nodes. Several free
tools can be found in the child nodes. Some paid tools are also
included.  In this workshop some tools as examples from the four main
nodes will be described. The e-skills learned from the workshop are useful
across various research disciplines and research institutions.

Problem
statements:

The
search can be time consuming and sometimes tedious task. How can make it
easier? How do deal with situations such as:

•         
“I just join as a new postgraduate student and I am not sure how to
do a
           
literature search”
•         
“I have been in research for some time now but I spend a lot of time to get the
           
articles I want”
•         
“I am sure I have downloaded the article but I am not able to find it”
•         
“I wanted to write a new paper, how can I manage the references in the
          
shortest possible time?”
•         
“I have many references, some of my old papers, and some of my current
           
research. Sometimes, they are so many that I can’t recall where I have kept
           
them in my folders!”
•         
“I have written an article and I am not able to find a proper Journal”
•         
"I want to increase the citation of my papers, how can I do?"

We need an effective search strategy
which can save hours of wasted research time and provide a clear direction for
your research. The benefits of attending this workshop are numerous and include
learning how to change the direction of searching to discover and how to use
more efficient the tools that are available through the Net.

Objectives

The
workshop seeks to serve the following objectives:

i.           
 
To
help students who seek to reduce the search time by expanding
ii.            Knowledge of
researchers to more effectively use the "tools" that are available
through the Net.
iii.           To evaluate the types
of literature that researchers will encounter.
iv.          To convert the
information of the search for a written document. 
v.            To promote their
publication for further citation.



Who
Should Attend

Simply, senior and junior researchers
along with supervisors who like in expanding their knowledge and developing a
research focus in the shortest possible time. Senior researcher can use the
tools to present their research more effectively to the scientific world which
will bring a higher level of comments and citations from other researchers
which will in turn improve their research. Junior researchers will be able with
the use of these tools to find a correct title and be able to focus and write
high quality academic proposals, thesis and articles.


Speaker
profile

Nader Ale Ebrahim is currently working
as a research fellow with the Research Support Unit, Centre of Research
Services, Institute of Research Management and Monitoring (IPPP), University of
Malaya. Nader holds a PhD degree in Technology Management from Faculty of
Engineering, University of Malaya. He has over 19 years of experience in the
field of technology management and new product development in different
companies. His current research interest focuses on E-skills, Research Tools,
Bibliometrics and managing virtual NPD teams in SMEs’ R&D
centers. Nader developed a new method using the “Research Tools” which
help students who seek to reduce the search time by expanding the knowledge of
researchers to effectively use the "tools" that are available on the
Internet. Research Tools consist of a hierarchical set of nodes. It has four
main nodes: (1) Searching the literature, (2) Writing a paper, (3) Targeting
suitable journals, and (4) Enhancing visibility and impact. He was the
winner of Refer-a-Colleague Competition and has received prizes from renowned
establishments such as Thomson Reuters. Nader is well-known as the founder of
“Research Tools” Box and the developer of “Publication Marketing Tools”. He
conducted over 100 workshops within and outside of university of Malaya.


STUDENT ENHANCEMENT
& WRITING UNIT

INSTITUTE OF GRADUATE STUDIES

UNIVERSITY OF MALAYA

TEL : 03-79676935

FAX : 03-79568940

email: ips_upskill@um.edu.my

 

INVITATION TO REGISTER

Application
is now open from  14 – 18 August 2015 or until the
maximum capacity is reached, whichever comes first.

Interested
participants, please submit your particulars by clicking the following
link: REGISTER
HERE
 .



Thank
you.


=====================================================

Deputy Dean

Institute of Graduate Studies

University of Malaya

50603 Kuala Lumpur MALAYSIA



http://www.um.edu.my/

http://www.ips.um.edu.my/

 




Upskill Programme: Introduction to the “Research Tools”

Thursday, 13 August 2015

INVITATION TO WORKSHOP SERIES BY CENTRE FOR RESEARCH SERVICES









INVITATION TO WORKSHOP SERIES BY CENTRE FOR RESEARCH SERVICES


Dear Campus Community;

Centre for Research Services (PPP)  would like to invite
you to participate in our workshop series.  The details of the workshops
are:


No

Title of Workshop

Date

Venue

1.

Conducting a Literature
Search & Writing Review Paper

2 & 3 September 2015

Computer Lab, Level 2,
Kompleks Pengurusan Penyelidikan & Inovasi, IPPP


2.

 Improve Research
Impact : Enhancing Research Visibility & Improving Citations

9 & 10 September 2015

Computer Lab, Level 2,
Kompleks Pengurusan Penyelidikan & Inovasi, IPPP

Kindly find the brochure of
the workshop and registration form in the attachment.  





For further information please call Pn Norhafizah (03-7967
7812 / uspi@um.edu.my). Registration
will be closed once we have reached the maximum number of registered
participants. 



Thank you.

Regards,

ASSOC. PROF. DR. NGOH GEK CHENG

Head of Research Support Unit,

Centre for Research Services,

Institute of Research Management & Monitoring (IPPP),
Level 2, Kompleks Pengurusan Penyelidikan
& Inovasi,
University of Malaya.
 




Mind Mapping Software: Mind Maps | MindMeister

10 Simple Steps to Maximize your Citation | Current World Environment

 Source: http://www.cwejournal.org/useful-information/10-simple-steps-to-maximize-your-citation/

10 Simple Steps to Maximize your Citation






















Citations


Click on the image to download PDF for this info graphics.






In a scholar’s career, the number and more significantly, the quality
of citations of the papers is quite imperative as it is increasingly
being used as an index for promotions, funding and grant reviews. Having
a considerably high amount of citations profoundly displays the impact
your research has on that field.


But maximizing and refining the citation is often looked up as rather
a bane of one’s existence. Well, although the job looks quite tough,
it’s pretty easy. Siding aside the paradox of the previous statement,
let’s look at some informative steps to increase your citation count:


  1. Cite your own work.
Although this may sound quite narcissistic, in the field of research
work, citing your own work is a well-thought-out; absolutely appropriate
technique for your research paper. Citing your own work has two
advantages:  First, it will act as a profile-raiser for all the work
you’ve done related to that certain subject. Second, it will, of course,
increase your citation count. Nevertheless, two things must be kept in
mind while citing your own wok: First, the previous works that you’re
citing should be relevant to the subject and second, not more than 25-30% of the citations should be of your own work.


  1. Cite the leaders of your field
Citing the pertinent leaders of your field gives out an impression
that you are well aware of the significant researches of the field, and
thus possess a vital knowledge of the contemporary works of the eminent
names in the field.  It also helps to introduce articulate terminology
for new concepts. Citing leaders in a field leads to reverse citations,
which carry more weight.


  1. Keywords are the key!
To expedite online article searches nowadays, most journals require
authors to select 4-8 keywords (or phrases) to accompany a manuscript.
This is where carefully chosen keywords come into play. Use the keywords
that, you believe, underline the theme of your work and that the
researchers are most likely to be looking up for, so that your paper
will be readily available in database searches.


  1. Cite your peers
Citing your colleagues is a well know practice to maximize your
citation count as well as to boost your impression on others of
possessing a great deal of information about the contemporary works and
effects. So cite your colleagues’ works wherever possible.  Also,
include in your citations, those colleagues too, whose result is
absolutely contrary to yours.


  1. Choose a wide field
Although this step cannot be followed by each scholar for their work,
but if it is possible (or if you are writing your paper as an amateur
researcher), choose a field that is large enough or has very significant
external applications. You will get a considerably high numbers of
sources to cite as well as a broad audience to cite you. Otherwise, your
citations will be limited to people or papers in a small community.





  1. Stick to a consistent name
It is observed quite often that people use, intentionally or
unintentionally, different names for different papers. Either they use
their initials on one paper and their full name on the others, or they
opt for a nom de plume for one paper and carry their original name for
the other. Whichever name you wish to use in your papers, stick to it.
Using the same name on all of your papers will make it easier for others
to find all of your published work. And thus, it births more chances of
others to cite you.


  1. Underline the significance of your research
Explain to your audience why your research matters. Conduct and take
part in conferences, participate in meetings, offer your lectures for
libraries and such gatherings. Also, use YouTube and TedTalk to spread
out your word. Utilize both institution and publisher press releases.
Most institutions have a public relations division that can help create
and deliver a press release.


  1. Unique and New
One thing to be kept in mind is the exclusivity of the paper.
Informative and unique papers often seem to go a long way and create a
firm impact on the field. If your paper ‘teaches’ something new and
beneficial to the other people, they will tend to cite your paper. It’s
one thing just putting together all the data and writing it up and
another being able to ‘communicate’ it to the rest.


  1. Review
A review exhibits thought-leadership within your field as well as the
simultaneous idea of revolutionary work regarding a certain research. 
It has been broadly observed that good reviews are often rewarded in the
form of good citation rate. These citations translate to higher impact
factors for the journals. Therefore, always consider writing a
tremendous review. It may or may not build up a good career alone but it
will unquestionably lead to a dramatic hype in overall citation count.


  1. Promote, promote, promote
Promote your work wherever you can. Talk to other researchers about
your paper, even ones not in your field, and email copies of your paper
to researchers who may be interested. Get active on social media. Create
a Facebook page and encourage discussion regarding your research, open a
Twitter account and actively promote the updates about your work, write
blogs about the revolutionary ideas related to your paper. Create a
Linked In account and get in talk with other people worldwide, post
about the conferences and meeting you have attended, ask questions, and
maybe list your publication. Use and Provide a link to your page on
social media. Get involved in it as much as you can.


While citing others, be careful about the names and spellings of
authors and their works, for such carelessness may lead to distaste
towards the author. Never forget to write a vibrant abstract so that
your article is appropriately indexed and easy to find. Give it an
effective title and submit it to the most respected journal.


Adopting various methods to maximize the citation count and citation
rate looks like a difficult job at first, but yields fantastic results.
Watching the citation rate growing high after striving hard for it is
quite rewarding and gratifying in its own way!




Views 
 Views: 22  
Share:Share on LinkedInShare on Google+Tweet about this on TwitterShare on Facebook

10 Simple Steps to Maximize your Citation | Current World Environment

Wednesday, 12 August 2015

A Comparison between Two Main Academic Literature Collections: Web of Science and Scopus Databases

A Comparison between Two Main Academic Literature Collections: Web of Science and Scopus Databases



Arezoo Aghaei Chadegani


Islamic Azad University; University Kebangsaan Malaysia

Hadi Salehi


Islamic Azad University, Najafabad Branch

Melor Md Yunus


National University of Malaysia - Faculty of Education

Hadi Farhadi


National University of Malaysia - Research Center for Islamic Economics and Finance (EKONIS-UKM)

Masood Fooladi


Islamic Azad University, Mobarakeh Branch

Maryam Farhadi


National University of Malaysia

Nader Ale Ebrahim


University
of Malaya (UM) - Department of Engineering Design and Manufacture,
Faculty of Engineering; University of Malaya (UM) - Research Support
Unit, Centre of Research Services, Institute of Research Management and
Monitoring (IPPP)




April 7, 2013


Asian Social Science, Vol. 9, No. 5, pp. 18-26, April 27, 2013





Abstract:
    



Nowadays, the world’s scientific community has been
publishing an enormous number of papers in different scientific fields.
In such environment, it is essential to know which databases are equally
efficient and objective for literature searches. It seems that two most
extensive databases are Web of Science and Scopus. Besides searching
the literature, these two databases used to rank journals in terms of
their productivity and the total citations received to indicate the
journals impact, prestige or influence. This article attempts to provide
a comprehensive comparison of these databases to answer frequent
questions which researchers ask, such as: How Web of Science and Scopus
are different? In which aspects these two databases are similar? Or, if
the researchers are forced to choose one of them, which one should they
prefer? For answering these questions, these two databases will be
compared based on their qualitative and quantitative characteristics.




Number of Pages in PDF File: 9



Keywords:
web of science, scopus, database, citations, provenance, coverage,
searching, citation tracking, impact factor, indexing, h-index,
researcher profile, researcher ID






JEL Classification: L1, L11, L7, M11, M12, M1, M54, Q1, O1, O3, Q31, Q32, P24, P42, P29, L17






Open PDF in Browser
Download This Paper

Date posted: April 29, 2013
; Last revised: May 9, 2013

Suggested Citation

Aghaei
Chadegani, Arezoo and Salehi, Hadi and Yunus, Melor Md and Farhadi,
Hadi and Fooladi, Masood and Farhadi, Maryam and Ale Ebrahim, Nader, A
Comparison between Two Main Academic Literature Collections: Web of
Science and Scopus Databases (April 7, 2013). Asian Social Science,
Vol. 9, No. 5, pp. 18-26, April 27, 2013. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2257540


A Comparison between Two Main Academic Literature Collections: Web of Science and Scopus Databases by Arezoo Aghaei Chadegani, Hadi Salehi, Melor Md Yunus, Hadi Farhadi, Masood Fooladi, Maryam Farhadi, Nader Ale Ebrahim :: SSRN